Enterprise AI & cyber security advisory

Secure AI.
Enable progress.

Lumina Security helps leaders turn complex AI, agentic and cyber risk into clear decisions, defensible controls and a practical path to adoption.

AI securityGovernance built for adoption
Agentic systemsIdentity, tools and oversight
Enterprise assuranceEvidence leaders can act on
AI assurance workspaceIllustrative view
Assessment lensControl-led adoption
  • Identity & accessReview
  • Data boundariesValidate
  • Human oversightDefine
  • Agent actionsAssure
Assessment route
Standard

A conceptual view of the evidence, trust boundaries and decisions brought together during an assessment.

Security thinking across

ChatGPT EnterpriseMicrosoft 365AzureEntra IDMCPGitHubDatabricks
01 — Why Lumina

Clarity before control

AI changes the system.
Security must change with it.

Autonomous agents, enterprise copilots and connected data introduce new identities, permissions and trust boundaries. We help organisations understand those changes early, decide what good looks like, and move from uncertainty to controlled adoption.

Core capabilities

Security that meets innovation where it is.

Focused advisory for the decisions that sit between business ambition, emerging technology and enterprise risk.

01

Strategic focus

Enterprise AI & agentic security

Assess AI use cases, autonomous agents and connected tools through identity, data, action, oversight and evidence lenses.

  • AI adoption guardrails
  • Agent and MCP security assessment
  • Responsible-use governance
02

Assurance

Security architecture & risk

Translate complex integrations and data flows into a decision-ready view of exposure, controls and treatment priorities.

  • Current and target-state review
  • Threat and trust-boundary analysis
  • Risk treatment roadmaps
03

Trust

Identity & access governance

Strengthen lifecycle, privileged access, access review and least-privilege expectations across people and machine identities.

  • Identity posture review
  • Access governance pathways
  • Zero Trust alignment
04

Governance

Data, compliance & third parties

Test whether data handling, provider assurance and governance evidence support the organisation’s risk decisions.

  • AI vendor assurance
  • Data protection analysis
  • Control and readiness reviews

Selected work themes

Use cases grounded in enterprise reality.

Examples are anonymised and describe advisory and assessment work without exposing client or implementation-sensitive detail.

Assessment pathway

Creating a repeatable security route for Codex and MCP adoption.

Structured current and target-state review across architecture, identity, data movement, connected tools and human oversight—then shaped risk-based Fast-track, Standard and Enhanced assessment routes.

Architecture triageApproval gatesEvidence modelRisk-based routing

Integration assurance

Examining enterprise AI integration with Microsoft 365.

Analysed SharePoint, Teams and Outlook data flows, Microsoft Graph permission scope, connector actions and pilot safeguards to surface the decisions needed before broader enablement.

Data-flow analysisPermission scopeConnector actionsPilot guardrails

Identity governance

Improving evidence for inactive-user and leaver reviews.

Distinguished lifecycle removal from inactivity-based review, identified tooling constraints and clarified how a reliable population and defensible review evidence could be established.

Review populationLeaver controlsTool constraintsAssurance evidence

Third-party AI risk

Turning provider claims into decision-ready assurance.

Assessed external AI and data-platform use cases for verified contractual protections, retention, training restrictions, audit rights and incident notification evidence.

Data handlingContract evidenceRetentionIncident obligations

Security control baseline

Defining control expectations for a managed platform.

Developed an assessment baseline spanning managed identities, MFA, Conditional Access, least privilege, privileged access, lifecycle and access reviews—clearly separating assumptions from verified controls.

MFA & accessManaged identitiesPrivilegeLifecycle review

Engineering governance

Assessing GitHub and AI skill-sharing patterns.

Explored repository use and shared AI capabilities through platform, team and governance risk lenses to support safer collaboration without overstating administrative or implementation ownership.

Repository trustSkill provenanceTeam boundariesGovernance pattern
Control viewMCP & agent assessment
IdentityDefined
DataReview
ActionsAssess
OversightDefined
EvidenceReview
Illustrative—not a client scorecard
02 — The assessment journey

A practical operating model

From ambitious idea to an accountable decision.

Every engagement is shaped to the risk and maturity of the initiative. The common thread is a transparent evidence trail and a clear owner for what happens next.

  1. 01

    Frame

    Clarify the use case, business outcome, actors, technology and decision required.

    Context
  2. 02

    Map

    Trace identities, data, integrations, tools, actions and critical trust boundaries.

    Architecture
  3. 03

    Assess

    Test control evidence, assumptions and risk against an appropriate assessment route.

    Assurance
  4. 04

    Enable

    Agree guardrails, treatment priorities, ownership and the conditions for adoption.

    Decision

Agentic AI security

When software can act, security must govern the action.

Agentic systems connect models to identities, memory, data and tools. Lumina Security examines the full chain—from the person making a request to the downstream service executing it.

  • Human and machine identity
  • Tool permissions and least privilege
  • Prompt, memory and data boundaries
  • Approval, logging and human oversight
Illustrative trust model
ActorUser
→
ReasoningAI agent
→
ProtocolMCP
→
ExecutionTools
Identity & session
Policy & permissions
Data & evidence
Lumina Security illuminated global network logo

Experience behind the advice

Enterprise security thinking, translated for leaders and delivery teams.

Lumina Security’s practice lead brings experience across security architecture, enterprise risk, identity, resilience and the governance of emerging AI systems. The work centres on making complex technology decisions understandable, evidence-based and actionable.

“The goal is not to slow innovation. It is to make the path to adoption clear, controlled and defensible.”
Enterprise AI securitySecurity architectureCyber riskIdentity governanceStakeholder assurance
View Harry Singh on LinkedIn

Professional credentials & memberships

CISSPCC (ISC)²AIGP (IAPP)TOGAF v10ISO 27001 Lead AuditorMicrosoft Security & Azure
Credentials are held by the practice lead. No affiliation or endorsement by the credential bodies is implied.

Start with the decision

What are you trying to enable—safely?

Tell us about the AI use case, integration, risk question or assurance challenge in front of you. We’ll start with a focused conversation about the decision you need to make.

0406 239 109
Secure enquiryTypically starts with a 30-minute conversation

Bring the challenge.
We’ll help frame the path.

Open the secure Microsoft enquiry form. Please do not include passwords, confidential material or sensitive personal information.

Open secure enquiry form Information is used only to respond to your enquiry. Read our Privacy Policy.